John C. Schelleng
Impact in
- Signal Processing top 10%
- Music and Audio Processing
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies
Papers in
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 7
- Co-authors
- D. W. Forester (4 shared papers)F. J. Rachford (1 shared paper)Douglas L. Smith (1 shared paper)M. J. Keskinen (1 shared paper)Dan Zabetakis (1 shared paper)R. R. Price (1 shared paper)Paul E. Schoen (1 shared paper)L.N. Medgyesi-Mitschang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (4 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (3 papers)Scientific American (1 paper)Journal of the Audio Engineering Society (1 paper)American String Teacher (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John C. Schelleng
12 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Signal Processing 95
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 167
- Music 18
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 5
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 94
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Schelleng
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Schelleng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Schelleng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Schelleng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Schelleng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Schelleng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Schelleng. The network helps show where John C. Schelleng may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside John C. Schelleng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1973 | 108 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1963 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1968 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1967 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 2 | |
| 13 | A New Concert Violin | 1967 | 1 |
| 14 | 1967 | 1 |
About John C. Schelleng
John C. Schelleng is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Music and Signal Processing, having authored 14 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (7 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (2 papers), Musicians’ Health and Performance (2 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (2 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers) and Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (95 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (167 citations), Music (18 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (5 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (94 citations). John C. Schelleng has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D. W. Forester, F. J. Rachford, Douglas L. Smith, M. J. Keskinen, Dan Zabetakis, R. R. Price, Paul E. Schoen, L.N. Medgyesi-Mitschang, César Monzón and Jürgen Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Applied Physics, Scientific American, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society and American String Teacher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.