John C. Pope

6.3k citations
163 papers · 4.2k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Pope

155 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

John C. Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Urology 1.5k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.2k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 224
  • Surgery 994
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 704
Replace James Mandell with:
James Mandell United States
Martin Kaefer United States
Paul F. Austin United States
Raju Thomas United States
Karl‐Dietrich Sievert Germany
John S. Wiener United States
Thomas F. Kolon United States
Arun K. Srinivasan United States
Philip J. Lupo United States
Eduardo E. Castilla Brazil
John C. Pope relative to James Mandell United States James Mandell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
James Mandell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Pope. The network helps show where John C. Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Pope Line = papers co-authored together John C. Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 163 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999154
2 2002143
3 2002134
4 1998119
5 2008118
6 200286
7 200680
8 200774
9 200573
10 200072
11 201171
12 200569
13 200268
14 199767
15 200266
16 200065
17 200264
18 200663
19 200863
20 198861

About John C. Pope

John C. Pope is a scholar working on Urology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Classics, having authored 163 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (38 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (31 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (15 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (13 papers), Medieval Literature and History (13 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (10 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (7 papers) and Renal and related cancers (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (1.5k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.2k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (224 citations), Surgery (994 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (704 citations). John C. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include John W. Brock, Mark C. Adams, John C. Thomas, Stacy T. Tanaka, Romano T. DeMarco, Iekuni Ichikawa, Douglass B. Clayton, Richard C. Rink, Bradley P. Kropp and F. Douglas Stephens. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Journal of Pediatric Urology, Urology, Speculum and Neurourology and Urodynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact