John C. Phillips

3.3k citations
125 papers · 2.4k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Phillips

115 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

John C. Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Pharmacology 356
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 458
  • Library and Information Sciences 42
  • Biochemistry 185
  • Cancer Research 272
Replace Frederick B. Rudolph with:
Frederick B. Rudolph United States
Michael Reed United Kingdom
Peter R. Sinclair United States
Kevin Jon Williams United States
Peter O’Connor United Kingdom
Alan J. Lewis United States
Robert K. Murray Canada
Christiane Stock Denmark
Roger Harrison United Kingdom
James E. Thompson United States
John C. Phillips relative to Frederick B. Rudolph United States Frederick B. Rudolph's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Frederick B. Rudolph · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Phillips. The network helps show where John C. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Phillips Line = papers co-authored together John C. Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988300
2 1990195
3 1977123
4 1991123
5 197787
6 197663
7 200357
8 199649
9 197448
10 198745
11 197944
12 200244
13 198642
14 197740
15 198140
16 199038
17 197136
18 198035
19 197534
20 199628

About John C. Phillips

John C. Phillips is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Biochemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Pharmacology, having authored 125 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (10 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (8 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (8 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (8 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (7 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (6 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (356 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (458 citations), Library and Information Sciences (42 citations), Biochemistry (185 citations) and Cancer Research (272 citations). John C. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include S.D. Gangolli, Gary Alan Fine, Brian G. Lake, R.C. Cottrell, Christine E Heading, Ian Rowland, D. Viza, Delos H. Kelly, D. M. Conning and I.F. Gaunt. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Toxicology and Sociology of Sport Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact