John C. Lusth

37 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

John C. Lusth
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 95
  • Software 20
  • Artificial Intelligence 162
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 26
  • Control and Systems Engineering 55
Replace Afaq Ahmad with:
Afaq Ahmad Oman
M. Morris Mano United States
J. Palmer United States
Y. Watanabe United States
Benjamin Carrión Schäfer United States
William H. Joyner United States
Johan Gunnarsson Sweden
Shaahin Hessabi Iran
F.J. Meyer United States
Edin Dolićanin Serbia
John C. Lusth relative to Afaq Ahmad Oman Afaq Ahmad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Afaq Ahmad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Lusth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Lusth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Lusth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Lusth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Lusth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Lusth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Lusth. The network helps show where John C. Lusth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Lusth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Lusth Line = papers co-authored together John C. Lusth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987108
2 198555
3 198429
4 200125
5 200724
6 199917
7 199612
8 19979
9 20099
10 20019
11 20118
12 20008
13 20137
14 20147
15 20127
16 20166
17 19836
18 19865
19 20024
20 19974

About John C. Lusth

John C. Lusth is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 43 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata (11 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (10 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (6 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (5 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (5 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers) and Cellular Automata and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (95 citations), Software (20 citations), Artificial Intelligence (162 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (26 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (55 citations). John C. Lusth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Joe W. Duran, S. L. Burkett, Bruce W. Ballard, Madhav Rao, Brandon Dixon, Magda El‐Shenawee, D. J. Jackson, M.R. Parker, Tracy Camp and C. B. Hanna. Their work appears in journals such as Information Sciences, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena, Journal of Applied Physics, Software Practice and Experience and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact