John C. Docherty

34 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

John C. Docherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 204
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 146
  • Physiology 129
  • Cell Biology 86
  • Biochemistry 34
Replace Donald H. Namm with:
Donald H. Namm United States
Gregory P. Dubé United States
Nelson Escobales Puerto Rico
Susanne Ursula Trost United States
Akira Moriguchi Japan
Valeri I. Kapelko Russia
Lindon Howard Young United States
N G Read United Kingdom
Edward D. Pagani United States
Audrey Ginion Belgium
John C. Docherty relative to Donald H. Namm United States Donald H. Namm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21×
Donald H. Namm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Docherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Docherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Docherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Docherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Docherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Docherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Docherty. The network helps show where John C. Docherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Docherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Docherty Line = papers co-authored together John C. Docherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002214
2 199958
3 200145
4 198444
5 198940
6 198735
7 198433
8 200431
9 198530
10 199929
11 199724
12 198617
13 198216
14 198214
15 197813
16 200613
17 199713
18 200811
19 199210
20 197110

About John C. Docherty

John C. Docherty is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (8 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (6 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (5 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (204 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (146 citations), Physiology (129 citations), Cell Biology (86 citations) and Biochemistry (34 citations). John C. Docherty has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander S. Clanachan, Que Liu, Gary D. Lopaschuk, Stanley B. Brown, Brent Schacter, Krisztina L. Malisza, Thomas W. Wilson, Jon M. Gerrard, Joanne Bowes and Jocelyn Anne Silvester. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Journal, Physics in Medicine and Biology, British Journal of Pharmacology, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact