John C. Chabala

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

John C. Chabala
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Small Animals 233
  • Cell Biology 180
  • Organic Chemistry 285
  • Pharmacology 146
  • Parasitology 58
Replace R. K. Chatterjee with:
R. K. Chatterjee India
T. R. Watson Australia
Lily C. Hsieh United States
Allen M. Gold United States
D.K. Inaoka Japan
Robert J. Barbuch United States
Tohru Nagamitsu Japan
Fernanda Ramos Gadelha Brazil
Y. Moulé France
Markus Fehr Germany
John C. Chabala relative to R. K. Chatterjee India R. K. Chatterjee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
R. K. Chatterjee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Chabala

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Chabala's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Chabala with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Chabala more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Chabala

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Chabala. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Chabala. The network helps show where John C. Chabala may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Chabala, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Chabala Line = papers co-authored together John C. Chabala links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980242
2 2004215
3 1981193
4 198069
5 198151
6 198849
7 198837
8 199135
9 197829
10 199222
11 198922
12 199520
13 197818
14 198818
15 200915
16 199114
17 199513
18 199113
19 198813
20 198312

About John C. Chabala

John C. Chabala is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Small Animals and Oncology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helminth infection and control (4 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (4 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (233 citations), Cell Biology (180 citations), Organic Chemistry (285 citations), Pharmacology (146 citations) and Parasitology (58 citations). John C. Chabala has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and France. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Mrozik, Philip Eskola, A Lusi, Richard L. Tolman, M. H. FISHER, William C. Campbell, Louis H. Peterson, Michael H. Fisher, Byron H. Arison and Jack L. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact