John C. Amedio

1.2k citations
21 papers · 993 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Amedio

21 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers

John C. Amedio
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Organic Chemistry 384
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 263
  • Inorganic Chemistry 104
  • Materials Chemistry 340
  • Biophysics 37
Replace Benjamin H. Fraser with:
Benjamin H. Fraser Australia
Adam T. Hoye United States
Ming Zhao China
Juan A. González‐Vera Spain
François Carreaux France
Claudio Iacobucci Germany
Jeff Kao United States
Thomas Wiglenda Germany
Arnaud Chevalier France
Kaiyan Lou China
John C. Amedio relative to Benjamin H. Fraser Australia Benjamin H. Fraser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Benjamin H. Fraser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Amedio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Amedio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Amedio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Amedio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Amedio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Amedio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Amedio. The network helps show where John C. Amedio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Amedio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Amedio Line = papers co-authored together John C. Amedio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002377
2 1985115
3 201798
4 198962
5 198850
6 198749
7 198644
8 199238
9 200930
10 200524
11 198924
12 199216
13 198916
14 199912
15 199511
16 200010
17 19987
18 20115
19 20023
20 20251

About John C. Amedio

John C. Amedio is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Materials Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (5 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers) and Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (384 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (263 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (104 citations), Materials Chemistry (340 citations) and Biophysics (37 citations). John C. Amedio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Douglass F. Taber, James D. White, Peter Caravan, Richard Looby, Randall B. Lauffer, Normand J. Cloutier, Stephen U. Dunham, Matthew T. Greenfield, Thomas J. McMurry and R.M. Supkowski. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Organic Process Research & Development, Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Anti-Cancer Drugs and Chemistry - A European Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact