John Biro

1.1k citations
43 papers · 351 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Philosophy and History of Science

Papers in

John Biro

39 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

John Biro
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Philosophy 207
  • History and Philosophy of Science 53
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 123
  • Artificial Intelligence 88
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Mark Lance with:
Mark Lance United States
John C. McDowell United Kingdom
Michael Blome‐Tillmann United Kingdom
Justin Khoo United States
Bede Rundle United Kingdom
Patrick Rysiew Canada
Levi Spectre Israel
Mitchell S. Green United States
Andrew Aberdein United States
Stephen Hetherington Australia
John Biro relative to Mark Lance United States Mark Lance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mark Lance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Biro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Biro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Biro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Biro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Biro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Biro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Biro. The network helps show where John Biro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Biro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Biro Line = papers co-authored together John Biro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199749
2 200835
3 197934
4 197732
5 200827
6
Spinoza : new perspectives
197824
7
Mind, Brain and Function
198222
8 198418
9 199115
10 20109
11 19769
12 19797
13
Mind, Brain, and Function: Essays in the Philosophy of Mind
19827
14 19796
15 19926
16 20175
17 20175
18 20114
19 20163
20 20063

About John Biro

John Biro is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (207 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (53 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 citations), Artificial Intelligence (88 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). John Biro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Harvey Siegel, Robert W. Shahan and Kirk Ludwig. Their work appears in journals such as Logos & Episteme, Analysis, Philosophical Issues, Metaphysica and Informal Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact