John Bingley

15 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

John Bingley
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Immunology and Allergy 35
  • Cell Biology 79
  • Cancer Research 60
  • Internal Medicine 13
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 120
Replace Jean-Luc Schwachtgen with:
Jean-Luc Schwachtgen France
Clément d’Audigier France
Brijesh Bhambi United States
Masahiko Zuka Japan
AM Randi United Kingdom
Gou Young Koh South Korea
Pieter T. Bot Netherlands
Anastasia Abashidze Israel
Sabina Vogel Germany
David P. Hughes United Kingdom
John Bingley relative to Jean-Luc Schwachtgen France Jean-Luc Schwachtgen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jean-Luc Schwachtgen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bingley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bingley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bingley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bingley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bingley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bingley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bingley. The network helps show where John Bingley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bingley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bingley Line = papers co-authored together John Bingley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2000110
2 199862
3 200354
4 201735
5 199929
6 201328
7 201626
8 200322
9 200118
10 199713
11
Peripheral arterial disease - screening in general practice.
20139
12 20226
13 20225
14 20024
15 20183
16 20220

About John Bingley

John Bingley is a scholar working on Surgery, Cell Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Hematology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (5 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (3 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (2 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (35 citations), Cell Biology (79 citations), Cancer Research (60 citations), Internal Medicine (13 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (120 citations). John Bingley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Campbell, Ian P. Hayward, Jonathan Golledge, Julie H. Campbell, Vikram Iyer, Erik Biroš, Peter Tesar, Homayoun Jalali, Mark F. O’Brien and Robert Tam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Annals of Vascular Surgery, Current Atherosclerosis Reports, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact