Peter Tesar

45 papers receiving 990 citations

Peers

Peter Tesar
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 434
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 43
  • Surgery 357
  • Epidemiology 232
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 218
Replace Gianpaolo Romano with:
Gianpaolo Romano Italy
Yves Van Belleghem Belgium
Tomáš Holubec Germany
Anthony J. Acinapura United States
Stefano Mastrobuoni Belgium
Per Wierup United States
Carolyn Weber Germany
Toshihiro Fukui Japan
M Turina Switzerland
Stephen M. Langley United States
Peter Tesar relative to Gianpaolo Romano Italy Gianpaolo Romano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gianpaolo Romano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Tesar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Tesar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Tesar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Tesar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Tesar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Tesar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Tesar. The network helps show where Peter Tesar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Tesar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Tesar Line = papers co-authored together Peter Tesar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995159
2
The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
2001155
3 2000110
4 201560
5 199746
6 200345
7 201341
8 200939
9 200932
10 201630
11 199528
12 201526
13 199525
14 201124
15 201222
16 201217
17 202016
18 199913
19 201712
20 201412

About Peter Tesar

Peter Tesar is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (16 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (9 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (6 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (5 papers), Blood transfusion and management (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (3 papers) and Cardiac tumors and thrombi (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (434 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (43 citations), Surgery (357 citations), Epidemiology (232 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (218 citations). Peter Tesar has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Pohlner, E. Gregory Stafford, Mark F. O’Brien, M. Gardner, John F. Fraser, Susan Smith, Andrew Cochrane, Homayoun Jalali, Susan Harrocks and M. F. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Medical Journal of Australia, Heart Lung and Circulation and BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact