Peter Tesar

48 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter Tesar
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 479
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 49
  • Surgery 396
  • Epidemiology 270
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 235
Replace Gianpaolo Romano with:
Gianpaolo Romano Italy
Yves Van Belleghem Belgium
Tomáš Holubec Germany
Anthony J. Acinapura United States
P Venugopal India
Per Wierup United States
Stefano Mastrobuoni Belgium
Stephen M. Langley United States
Fabrizio Follis United States
Carolyn Weber Germany
Peter Tesar relative to Gianpaolo Romano Italy Gianpaolo Romano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gianpaolo Romano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Tesar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Tesar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Tesar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Tesar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Tesar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Tesar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Tesar. The network helps show where Peter Tesar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Tesar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Tesar Line = papers co-authored together Peter Tesar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
2001171
2 1995166
3 2000115
4 201565
5 199751
6 200346
7 201343
8 200940
9 200932
10 199530
11 201630
12 201526
13 199525
14 201124
15 201223
16 201217
17 202016
18 199914
19 198813
20 201712

About Peter Tesar

Peter Tesar is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (20 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (11 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (8 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Blood transfusion and management (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers) and Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (479 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (49 citations), Surgery (396 citations), Epidemiology (270 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (235 citations). Peter Tesar has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Pohlner, E. Gregory Stafford, Mark F. O’Brien, M. Gardner, John F. Fraser, Susan Smith, Andrew Cochrane, M. F. O’Brien, Susan Harrocks and F. Douglas Stephens. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Medical Journal of Australia, Heart Lung and Circulation and BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact