John Best

48 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

John Best
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • General Psychology 11
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 80
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 41
  • Emergency Medical Services 21
  • General Health Professions 74
Replace Lorraine Frazier with:
Lorraine Frazier United States
Naijian Zhang China
Gilbert Becker Canada
Daniel Potter United States
Nikki Lynn Rogers United States
Rebecca L. Flower Australia
Christine Driver United States
Jay Moskowitz United States
Jennifer Johnston Australia
Pei‐Ju Liao Taiwan
John Best relative to Lorraine Frazier United States Lorraine Frazier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Lorraine Frazier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Best

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Best more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Best

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Best. The network helps show where John Best may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Best, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Best Line = papers co-authored together John Best links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197187
2
A preliminary study of perceived warmth of professor and student evaluations.
200031
3 200231
4 197230
5 196924
6 196822
7 198217
8 197617
9 198216
10 198715
11 200214
12 200313
13 197913
14 199010
15 19839
16 19826
17 19866
18 19746
19 19705
20 20025

About John Best

John Best is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (11 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (80 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (41 citations), Emergency Medical Services (21 citations) and General Health Professions (74 citations). John Best has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. P. Coghlan, William E. Addison, E. Cran, Michael D. Cain, K. J. Catt, Paul Zimmet, Henry Burger, Heather McElroy, Justin Beilby and Kathy Mott. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, The Lancet, The Journal of General Psychology, Thinking & Reasoning and The Psychological Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact