John Best

48 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

John Best
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • General Psychology 11
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 83
  • Health 27
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 70
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 45
Replace Lorraine Frazier with:
Lorraine Frazier United States
Christine Driver United States
Naijian Zhang China
Daniel Potter United States
John H. Morgan United States
Rebecca L. Flower Australia
Robert A. Logan United Kingdom
Denis J. Prager United States
Nikki Lynn Rogers United States
Ramesh C. Mishra India
John Best relative to Lorraine Frazier United States Lorraine Frazier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Lorraine Frazier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Best

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Best more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Best

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Best. The network helps show where John Best may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Best, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Best Line = papers co-authored together John Best links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197198
2
A preliminary study of perceived warmth of professor and student evaluations.
200031
3 197231
4 200231
5 196827
6 196926
7 197624
8 198220
9 198218
10 198217
11 198716
12 197915
13 200214
14 200313
15 199011
16 198610
17 19839
18 19748
19 19876
20 19705

About John Best

John Best is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (11 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (83 citations), Health (27 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (70 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (45 citations). John Best has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. Cran, J. P. Coghlan, Henry Burger, K. J. Catt, Michael D. Cain, Paul Zimmet, William E. Addison, Kay Price, Kathy Mott and Heather McElroy. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, The Lancet, Thinking & Reasoning, The Journal of General Psychology and Memory & Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact