John Bell

2.2k citations
102 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

John Bell

93 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers

John Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Theoretical Computer Science 75
  • History and Philosophy of Science 128
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 370
  • Mathematical Physics 113
  • Artificial Intelligence 424
Replace Benedikt Löwe with:
Benedikt Löwe Netherlands
Dirk van Dalen Netherlands
George Boole
Steve Awodey United States
H. B. Enderton United States
Kenneth L. Manders United States
John N. Crossley Australia
Elliott Mendelson United States
William Craig United States
Andrew Hodges United Kingdom
John Bell relative to Benedikt Löwe Netherlands Benedikt Löwe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Benedikt Löwe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bell. The network helps show where John Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bell Line = papers co-authored together John Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198795
2
Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction
198872
3 201662
4 198658
5 198657
6 199750
7 198147
8 199041
9 201137
10 199625
11 199025
12 196620
13 198218
14 198217
15 201916
16 199315
17 199715
18 199315
19 199315
20 202214

About John Bell

John Bell is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (36 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (23 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (8 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (8 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (7 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (75 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (128 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (370 citations), Mathematical Physics (113 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (424 citations). John Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Flynn, Zhisheng Huang, Kyojin Choo, William Demopoulos, D. H. Fremlin, Michael Hallett, Arie Struyk, James L. Salzer, Daniel Afar and Liliana Pedraza. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Axiomathes, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact