John Barton

4.5k citations
98 papers · 772 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John Barton

79 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers

John Barton
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Religious studies 248
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • Development 37
  • Archeology 60
  • Literature and Literary Theory 58
Replace C. J. Fuller with:
C. J. Fuller United States
William Wood United States
Paul Matthews United Kingdom
David A. Campbell United States
Merriam-Webster
Vaughan S. Roberts New Zealand
Thomas Jefferson United States
Michaël Edwards United Kingdom
Mary C. Wright United States
Michael Sullivan United States
John Barton relative to C. J. Fuller United States C. J. Fuller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×68×
C. J. Fuller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Barton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Barton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Barton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Barton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Barton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Barton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Barton. The network helps show where John Barton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Barton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Barton Line = papers co-authored together John Barton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982139
2 198747
3 200944
4 200737
5 200436
6 198632
7 201428
8 199825
9 197323
10
Ethics and the Old Testament
199821
11
Understanding Old Testament Ethics: Approaches and Explorations
200320
12 198419
13 198819
14 200917
15 197815
16 199013
17 200512
18
After the exile : essays in honour of Rex Mason,
199611
19 200911
20 197911

About John Barton

John Barton is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 98 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (43 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (10 papers), Chaos, Complexity, and Education (5 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Development, Ethics, and Society (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (248 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations), Development (37 citations), Archeology (60 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (58 citations). John Barton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tim Haslett, Steven J. Sherman, Clark C. Presson, Laurie Chassin, P.F. Nolan, John R. Stephens, John W. Selsky, Robert Morgan, Merrelyn Emery and Eric Wolstenholme. Their work appears in journals such as Theology, The Journal of Theological Studies, Journal of Dental Research, Literature and Theology and Journal for the Study of the Old Testament.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact