John Asher Johnson
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 0.2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.2%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 184
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 133
- Astro and Planetary Science 104
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 15
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics 7
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 76
- Co-authors
- Geoffrey W. Marcy (51 shared papers)Andrew W. Howard (46 shared papers)Debra A. Fischer (39 shared papers)Joshua N. Winn (22 shared papers)Jason T. Wright (31 shared papers)Timothy D. Morton (17 shared papers)Howard T. Isaacson (27 shared papers)Rebekah I. Dawson (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (78 papers)The Astronomical Journal (25 papers)Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (9 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (8 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
John Asher Johnson
208 papers receiving 21.4k citations
John Asher Johnson's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Instrumentation 8.5k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 21.8k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 662
- Computational Mechanics 951
- Geophysics 549
Countries citing papers authored by John Asher Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of John Asher Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Asher Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Asher Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Asher Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Asher Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Asher Johnson. The network helps show where John Asher Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Asher Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 211 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 3036 |
| 2 | Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 2762 |
| 3 | The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets* Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 1027 |
| 4 | PLANET OCCURRENCE WITHIN 0.25 AU OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS FROM KEPLER Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 766 |
| 5 | Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 725 |
| 6 | Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 587 |
| 7 | OBLIQUITIES OF HOT JUPITER HOST STARS: EVIDENCE FOR TIDAL INTERACTIONS AND PRIMORDIAL MISALIGNMENTS Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 467 |
| 8 | Origins of Hot Jupiters Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 458 |
| 9 | HOT STARS WITH HOT JUPITERS HAVE HIGH OBLIQUITIES Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 456 |
| 10 | The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 417 |
| 11 | A Technique for Extracting Highly Precise Photometry for the Two-Wheeled Kepler Mission Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 380 |
| 12 | A disintegrating minor planet transiting a white dwarf Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 349 |
| 13 | MASSES, RADII, AND ORBITS OF SMALL KEPLER PLANETS: THE TRANSITION FROM GASEOUS TO ROCKY PLANETS Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 307 |
| 14 | 2010 | 257 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 253 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 252 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 246 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 245 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 239 | |
| 20 | The California-Kepler Survey. IV. Metal-rich Stars Host a Greater Diversity of Planets | 2018 | 236 |
About John Asher Johnson
John Asher Johnson is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Computational Mechanics, Spectroscopy and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 211 papers that have together received 23.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (184 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (133 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (104 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (76 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (15 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (7 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (6 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (8.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (21.8k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (662 citations), Computational Mechanics (951 citations) and Geophysics (549 citations). John Asher Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey W. Marcy, Andrew W. Howard, Debra A. Fischer, Joshua N. Winn, Jason T. Wright, Timothy D. Morton, Howard T. Isaacson, Rebekah I. Dawson, Andrew Vanderburg and R. Paul Butler. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, The Astronomical Journal, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.