John Arthos
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Philosophy top 5%
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Papers in
- Philosophy 20
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 12
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies 8
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 6
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 4
- Co-authors
- Michael Wilding (1 shared paper)Robert Bechtold Heilman (1 shared paper)Barbara Kiefer Lewalski (1 shared paper)William Kurtz Wimsatt (1 shared paper)Josephine Miles (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- MLN (4 papers)Quarterly Journal of Speech (3 papers)Philosophy and Rhetoric (3 papers)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Modern Language Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Arthos
29 papers receiving 80 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Literature and Literary Theory 51
- Philosophy 50
- Classics 8
- Communication 12
- Museology 6
Countries citing papers authored by John Arthos
This map shows the geographic impact of John Arthos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Arthos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Arthos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Arthos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Arthos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Arthos. The network helps show where John Arthos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside John Arthos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 18 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1970 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1957 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1951 | 7 | |
| 10 | Milton and the Italian cities | 1968 | 4 |
| 11 | 1957 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 19 | Shakespeare: the early writings | 1972 | 2 |
| 20 | 1959 | 2 |
About John Arthos
John Arthos is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Communication, having authored 43 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (12 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (8 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (5 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations), Philosophy (50 citations), Classics (8 citations), Communication (12 citations) and Museology (6 citations). John Arthos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Wilding, Robert Bechtold Heilman, Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, William Kurtz Wimsatt and Josephine Miles. Their work appears in journals such as MLN, Quarterly Journal of Speech, Philosophy and Rhetoric, The Modern Language Review and Modern Language Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.