John Armstrong

59 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

John Armstrong
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Geometry and Topology 84
  • Gender Studies 73
  • Applied Mathematics 82
  • Environmental Engineering 97
  • Finance 58
Replace Jon Gjerde with:
Jon Gjerde Norway
Ganesh P. Pokhariyal Kenya
Giada Adelfio Italy
Enrico Casadio Tarabusi Italy
T. Jayaraman India
Xiangyu Ge China
Riccardo Borgoni Italy
J. E. Oeppen Germany
Luojia Hu United States
Flemming Larsen Denmark
John Armstrong relative to Jon Gjerde Norway Jon Gjerde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Jon Gjerde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Armstrong. The network helps show where John Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Armstrong Line = papers co-authored together John Armstrong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198879
2 201354
3 199039
4 199835
5 201233
6 199119
7 199719
8 200218
9 201916
10 200215
11 200614
12
Gender quotas in management boards
201214
13 201012
14 200011
15 201411
16 201010
17 20189
18 20029
19 19767
20 20147

About John Armstrong

John Armstrong is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Geometry and Topology, Management Science and Operations Research and Applied Mathematics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and financial applications (10 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (7 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (6 papers), Global Health Care Issues (5 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers) and Coastal and Marine Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (84 citations), Gender Studies (73 citations), Applied Mathematics (82 citations), Environmental Engineering (97 citations) and Finance (58 citations). John Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sylvia Walby, Sofia Strid, John T. Wilson, Damiano Brigo, Philip B. Bedient, Hanadi S. Rifai, Karen M. Miller, Vestislav Apostolov, David Rose and Richard J. Black. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Health Policy, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, British Educational Research Journal and The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact