John Armitage

71 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

John Armitage
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Transplantation 55
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 73
  • Computer Science Applications 53
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • Communication 47
Replace Martha Woodmansee with:
Martha Woodmansee United States
Lucy Montgomery Australia
André Millard United States
Siva Vaidhyanathan United States
Peter Jaszi United States
Richard Barbrook United Kingdom
Ned Rossiter Australia
Christian Borch Denmark
Werner Rammert Germany
Geert Lovink Netherlands
John Armitage relative to Martha Woodmansee United States Martha Woodmansee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Martha Woodmansee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Armitage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Armitage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Armitage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Armitage more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Armitage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Armitage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Armitage. The network helps show where John Armitage may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Armitage, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Armitage Line = papers co-authored together John Armitage links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Adverse effects associated with the use of FK 506.
1991141
2 200176
3 200261
4 200045
5 200639
6 200432
7 200831
8 200328
9 200521
10 200620
11 201518
12
Overview of FK506 in transplantation.
199015
13 200015
14 200515
15
Resisting the Neoliberal Discourse of Technology The Politics of Cyberculture in the Age of the Virtual Class
199914
16 201414
17 200114
18 201314
19 198913
20 199912

About John Armitage

John Armitage is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Urban Studies and Museology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 854 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art, Politics, and Modernism (12 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (7 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (6 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation (4 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (4 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (55 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (73 citations), Computer Science Applications (53 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations) and Communication (47 citations). John Armitage has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Roberts, A Jain, M Alessiani, John J. Fung, Kareem Abu‐Elmagd, Ron Shapiro, Andreas G. Tzakis, J McCauley, S Todo and David Van Thiel. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural Politics an International Journal, Angelaki, Theory Culture & Society, French Cultural Studies and Parallax.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact