John A. Smith

39 papers receiving 721 citations

Peers

John A. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Equine 21
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 175
  • Animal Science and Zoology 96
  • Neurology 137
  • Otorhinolaryngology 33
Replace P Watkins with:
P Watkins United Kingdom
Zeki Yılmaz Türkiye
A. Nash United Kingdom
Erik J. Olson United States
Luigi Greco Italy
G Seçmeer Türkiye
Brendan C. McKiernan United States
Michael D. Schuffler United States
Susan M. Newell United States
Merja Helminen Finland
John A. Smith relative to P Watkins United Kingdom P Watkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
P Watkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Smith. The network helps show where John A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John A. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Smith Line = papers co-authored together John A. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974190
2 197688
3 198961
4 199955
5 201846
6 201836
7 198133
8 197533
9 197928
10 200924
11 198020
12 200219
13 199118
14 198217
15 201817
16 198413
17 197910
18 198310
19 20209
20 19878

About John A. Smith

John A. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Animal Science and Zoology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 42 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (2 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (21 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (175 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (96 citations), Neurology (137 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (33 citations). John A. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Jay L. Grosfeld, Donald R. Cooney, Robert L. Campbell, Eugene C. Klatte, Edmund A. Franken, Charles L. Hofacre, Greg F. Mathis, Mervyn D. Cohen, Wilbur L. Smith and Kenneth E. Fellows. Their work appears in journals such as Avian Diseases, Clinical Radiology, PEDIATRICS, Radiology and British Journal of Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact