John A. Findlay

86 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

John A. Findlay
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Biotechnology 318
  • Toxicology 74
  • Pharmacology 363
  • Aquatic Science 140
  • Organic Chemistry 527
Replace Michele D’Ambrosio with:
Michele D’Ambrosio Italy
Douglas E. Goeger United States
E. Dilip de Silva Sri Lanka
Donald B. Stierle United States
Yukiko Kan Japan
Shigeo Nozoe Japan
Masanori Inagaki Japan
Silvana Magno Italy
Christos Roussakis France
Tomofumi Miyamoto Japan
John A. Findlay relative to Michele D’Ambrosio Italy Michele D’Ambrosio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michele D’Ambrosio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Findlay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Findlay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Findlay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Findlay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Findlay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Findlay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Findlay. The network helps show where John A. Findlay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John A. Findlay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Findlay Line = papers co-authored together John A. Findlay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978110
2 1980101
3 200277
4 199275
5 198473
6 199165
7 199751
8 200346
9 198144
10 198143
11 196741
12 198638
13 198735
14 197331
15 201930
16 198530
17 196628
18 198727
19 197126
20 198226

About John A. Findlay

John A. Findlay is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Aquatic Science, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (22 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (12 papers), Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (12 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (9 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (8 papers), Echinoderm biology and ecology (7 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (6 papers) and Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (318 citations), Toxicology (74 citations), Pharmacology (363 citations), Aquatic Science (140 citations) and Organic Chemistry (527 citations). John A. Findlay has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lajos Radics, J. David Miller, Ashok D. Patil, Zhengquan He, Peter S. White, Jia-Sen Liu, Larry A. Calhoun, David H. Kwan, Norman J. Whitney and Guoqiang Li. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Natural Products, Tetrahedron Letters, Phytochemistry and Botanica Marina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact