Johan van Nes
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Papers in
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 3
- Protein Degradation and Inhibitors 2
- Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer 2
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 2
-
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments 6
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline Deschamps (3 shared papers)Jan Köster (5 shared papers)Felix Beck (2 shared papers)Wim de Graaff (2 shared papers)Rogier Versteeg (5 shared papers)Peter van Sluis (3 shared papers)Marloes E.C. Broekmans (3 shared papers)Linda J. Valentijn (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Development (2 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)Ophthalmology (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)JCO Precision Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Johan van Nes
9 papers receiving 929 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Neurology 272
- Cancer Research 175
- Molecular Biology 724
- Genetics 200
- Developmental Biology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Johan van Nes
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan van Nes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan van Nes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan van Nes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johan van Nes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan van Nes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan van Nes. The network helps show where Johan van Nes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan van Nes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 291 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 198 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 166 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 96 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 95 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 0 |
About Johan van Nes
Johan van Nes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cancer Research, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (6 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (2 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper) and Corneal surgery and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (272 citations), Cancer Research (175 citations), Molecular Biology (724 citations), Genetics (200 citations) and Developmental Biology (15 citations). Johan van Nes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Deschamps, Jan Köster, Felix Beck, Wim de Graaff, Rogier Versteeg, Peter van Sluis, Marloes E.C. Broekmans, Linda J. Valentijn, Franciska Haneveld and Jan J. Molenaar. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Clinical Cancer Research, Ophthalmology, Nature Communications and JCO Precision Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.