Johan Stedt

619 citations
13 papers · 461 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Stedt

12 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Johan Stedt
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Molecular Medicine 345
  • Endocrinology 119
  • Pollution 249
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 27
  • Clinical Biochemistry 43
Replace Ivana Jamborová with:
Ivana Jamborová Czechia
Brenda Cardoso Brazil
S. Bengtsson Sweden
Sandra Scheufen Germany
Kara Waits United States
Bruna Fuga Brazil
Hanna Woksepp Sweden
Salim Aberkane France
Joanne L. Mollinger Australia
Jean-Yves Madec France
Johan Stedt relative to Ivana Jamborová Czechia Ivana Jamborová's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ivana Jamborová · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Stedt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Stedt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Stedt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Stedt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Stedt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Stedt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Stedt. The network helps show where Johan Stedt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Stedt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Stedt Line = papers co-authored together Johan Stedt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201575
2 201074
3 201370
4 201257
5 201454
6 201541
7 201337
8 201824
9 201119
10 20136
11
Parasitizing behavior of Ixodes uriae ticks on Chilean Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) and their importance as pathogen vectors
20092
12 20101
13 20121

About Johan Stedt

Johan Stedt is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Food Science, Pollution, Endocrinology and Ecology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (8 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (4 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (3 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (2 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (2 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (2 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (345 citations), Endocrinology (119 citations), Pollution (249 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (27 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (43 citations). Johan Stedt has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Chile and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jonas Bonnedahl, Björn Olsén, Mirva Drobni, Jonas Waldenström, Jorge Hernández, Anders Johansson, Barry J. McMahon, Jorge Hernández, Daniel González‐Acuña and Badrul Hasan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and Environmental Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact