Johan Bring
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 7
-
- Advanced Statistical Methods and Models 3
- Co-authors
- Claes Olerud (3 shared papers)Andrew Frost (1 shared paper)Danielle Friberg (8 shared papers)Nanna Browaldh (7 shared papers)Lars‐Erik Strender (11 shared papers)Henric Blomgren (1 shared paper)G. E. F. Lundell (1 shared paper)Leif Tallstedt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Family Practice (3 papers)European Spine Journal (3 papers)The Lancet Global Health (2 papers)Quality & Quantity (2 papers)The Laryngoscope (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Johan Bring
56 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Family Practice 27
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 139
- Biochemistry 56
- Physiology 182
- Statistics and Probability 88
Countries citing papers authored by Johan Bring
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Bring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Bring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Bring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Bring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Bring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Bring. The network helps show where Johan Bring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Bring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 407 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 143 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 134 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 132 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 93 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 58 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 51 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 51 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 48 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 46 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 21 |
About Johan Bring
Johan Bring is a scholar working on Family Practice, Statistics and Probability, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (7 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (27 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (139 citations), Biochemistry (56 citations), Physiology (182 citations) and Statistics and Probability (88 citations). Johan Bring has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Claes Olerud, Andrew Frost, Danielle Friberg, Nanna Browaldh, Lars‐Erik Strender, Henric Blomgren, G. E. F. Lundell, Leif Tallstedt, Marianne Lannsjö and Jörgen Borg. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Family Practice, European Spine Journal, The Lancet Global Health, Quality & Quantity and The Laryngoscope.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.