Joep Beumer
Impact in
- Oncology top 2%
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Gut microbiota and health
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Hans C. Clevers (30 shared papers)Jens Puschhof (9 shared papers)Johan H. van Es (5 shared papers)Alexander van Oudenaarden (3 shared papers)Onur Başak (2 shared papers)Cayetano Pleguezuelos‐Manzano (3 shared papers)Hiroshi Seno (1 shared paper)Kay Wiebrands (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (3 papers)Cell (3 papers)Cell stem cell (2 papers)Nature Communications (2 papers)The EMBO Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joep Beumer
31 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Joep Beumer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Oncology 921
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Genetics 506
- Aging 29
- Gastroenterology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Joep Beumer
This map shows the geographic impact of Joep Beumer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joep Beumer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joep Beumer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joep Beumer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joep Beumer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joep Beumer. The network helps show where Joep Beumer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joep Beumer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cell fate specification and differentiation in the adult mammalian intestine Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 462 |
| 2 | 2016 | 278 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 241 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 229 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 227 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 208 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 193 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 181 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 172 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 117 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 105 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 83 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 73 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 73 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 68 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 59 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 56 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 27 |
About Joep Beumer
Joep Beumer is a scholar working on Oncology, Genetics, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 33 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (11 papers), Digestive system and related health (11 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (9 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (3 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (3 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (3 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (921 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations), Genetics (506 citations), Aging (29 citations) and Gastroenterology (77 citations). Joep Beumer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans C. Clevers, Jens Puschhof, Johan H. van Es, Alexander van Oudenaarden, Onur Başak, Cayetano Pleguezuelos‐Manzano, Hiroshi Seno, Kay Wiebrands, Benedetta Artegiani and Helmuth Gehart. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cell, Cell stem cell, Nature Communications and The EMBO Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.