Joe McDermott
Impact in
-
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Papers in
-
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics 1
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 1
- Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives 1
- Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry 1
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 1
-
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 1
- Co-authors
- Farah Shah (1 shared paper)Victor W. Pike (1 shared paper)Susan P. Hume (1 shared paper)Sharon Ashworth (1 shared paper)Julian Davies (1 shared paper)Geeta Saxena (1 shared paper)Guido Meurer (1 shared paper)Edmund I. Graziani (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nuclear Medicine and Biology (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)Organic Letters (1 paper)Reinforced Plastics (2 papers)Garden History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Joe McDermott
6 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Neurology 52
- Pharmacology 82
- Biotechnology 43
- Inorganic Chemistry 59
- Organic Chemistry 103
Countries citing papers authored by Joe McDermott
This map shows the geographic impact of Joe McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe McDermott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joe McDermott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe McDermott. The network helps show where Joe McDermott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Joe McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 169 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 163 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 76 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 1 |
About Joe McDermott
Joe McDermott is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Strategy and Management and Oncology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (1 paper), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (1 paper), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives (1 paper), Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry (1 paper), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (1 paper), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (1 paper) and Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (52 citations), Pharmacology (82 citations), Biotechnology (43 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (59 citations) and Organic Chemistry (103 citations). Joe McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Farah Shah, Victor W. Pike, Susan P. Hume, Sharon Ashworth, Julian Davies, Geeta Saxena, Guido Meurer, Edmund I. Graziani, Barbara Waters and Gui-Yang-Sheng Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Chemical Communications, Organic Letters, Reinforced Plastics and Garden History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.