Joe E. Springer

6.9k citations
87 papers · 6.0k · h-index 39

Impact in

Papers in

Joe E. Springer

86 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Joe E. Springer
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Developmental Neuroscience 848
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.1k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.6k
  • Neurology 1.2k
  • Neurology 637
Replace Eskil Elmér with:
Eskil Elmér Sweden
Jeffrey M. Gidday United States
Frank P.T. Hamers Netherlands
Ryuji Hata Japan
Jose R. Perez-Polo United States
M. D. Norenberg United States
Susan M. Knoblach United States
Dana M. McTigue United States
Damien Daniel Pearse United States
Hiroyuki Kato Japan
Joe E. Springer relative to Eskil Elmér Sweden Eskil Elmér's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Eskil Elmér · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joe E. Springer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joe E. Springer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe E. Springer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe E. Springer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joe E. Springer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe E. Springer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe E. Springer. The network helps show where Joe E. Springer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joe E. Springer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joe E. Springer Line = papers co-authored together Joe E. Springer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998453
2 1999409
3 2002334
4 2004332
5 2004325
6 1997272
7 1999227
8 2000186
9 1987186
10 1994174
11 1997173
12 2003166
13 1996154
14 2015127
15 2004112
16 1988103
17 200792
18 201187
19 198786
20 201082

About Joe E. Springer

Joe E. Springer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 87 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (23 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (23 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (17 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (10 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (9 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (7 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (848 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.6k citations), Neurology (1.2k citations) and Neurology (637 citations). Joe E. Springer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Azbill, Patrick G. Sullivan, Edward D. Hall, Xiaojun Mu, Mark P. Mattson, Pamela E. Knapp, Melanie L. McEwen, Alexander G. Rabchevsky, Sonia L. Carlson and Byoung Joo Gwag. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neurotrauma, Brain Research, Journal of Neurochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact