Jochen Einbeck

817 citations
57 papers · 461 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jochen Einbeck

53 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Jochen Einbeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 84
  • Statistics and Probability 79
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 83
  • Computational Mathematics 4
  • Equine 7
Replace Bart Bakker with:
Bart Bakker Netherlands
Qifan Song United States
Lizhen Lin United States
James Wilson United States
Hölger Hoefling Switzerland
Artur Gramacki Poland
Jianfeng Deng China
Duncan J. Murdoch Canada
Longhai Li Canada
Tommy Löfstedt Sweden
Jochen Einbeck relative to Bart Bakker Netherlands Bart Bakker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bart Bakker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Einbeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Einbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Einbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Einbeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen Einbeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Einbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Einbeck. The network helps show where Jochen Einbeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jochen Einbeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen Einbeck Line = papers co-authored together Jochen Einbeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007120
2 200560
3 200630
4 201528
5 200721
6 202015
7 201015
8 202314
9 201114
10 201813
11 201013
12 202010
13 20189
14 20139
15 20208
16 20216
17 20126
18 20164
19 20234
20 20034

About Jochen Einbeck

Jochen Einbeck is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Control and Systems Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (13 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (12 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (9 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (8 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), Control Systems and Identification (4 papers), Statistical and numerical algorithms (4 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (84 citations), Statistics and Probability (79 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (83 citations), Computational Mathematics (4 citations) and Equine (7 citations). Jochen Einbeck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Tutz, Ludger Evers, David Higgins, John Newell, Niall Madden, K McMillan, Elizabeth A. Ainsbury, Ursula Gather, Roland Fried and Pedro Puig. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, International Journal of Radiation Biology, Statistics and Computing, Statistical Modelling and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact