Jochen Campo

30 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Jochen Campo
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 300
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 100
  • Materials Chemistry 444
  • Organic Chemistry 167
  • Biomedical Engineering 256
Replace Fredrick W. Vance with:
Fredrick W. Vance United States
Eric A. Juban United States
Seung Joon Jeon South Korea
Mikael Kuisma Finland
K. Mansour United States
Carlos Toro United States
Shinjiro Machida Japan
Pasi Myllyperkiö Finland
P. Kaatz United States
Sylwester Gawinkowski Poland
Jochen Campo relative to Fredrick W. Vance United States Fredrick W. Vance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.6×
Fredrick W. Vance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Campo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Campo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Campo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Campo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen Campo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Campo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Campo. The network helps show where Jochen Campo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jochen Campo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen Campo Line = papers co-authored together Jochen Campo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201590
2 200979
3 201063
4 200760
5 201646
6 201845
7 201242
8 202041
9 201141
10 201440
11 200627
12 201323
13 200821
14 201521
15 202020
16 201919
17 200719
18 201919
19 200617
20 201214

About Jochen Campo

Jochen Campo is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Atmospheric Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 796 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (13 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (7 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (7 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (7 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (6 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (6 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (5 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (300 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (100 citations), Materials Chemistry (444 citations), Organic Chemistry (167 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (256 citations). Jochen Campo has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wim Wenseleers, E. Goovaerts, Sofie Cambré, Filip Desmet, Nikolay S. Makarov, Joseph W. Perry, Pegie Cool, Charlie Beirnaert, Christof Verlackt and Marek Szablewski. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Chemistry of Materials, ACS Nano, Optics Express and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact