Joanne E. Stephen

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Joanne E. Stephen
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Oncology 384
  • Applied Psychology 67
  • Clinical Psychology 283
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 141
Replace Tasneem L. Talib with:
Tasneem L. Talib United States
Sharon R. Sears United States
Erin L. Merz United States
Anao Zhang United States
Jennifer L. Austenfeld United States
Tânia Brandão Portugal
Kenneth B. Matheny United States
Volker Tschuschke Germany
Marialaura Di Tella Italy
Julie C. S. Boiché France
Joanne E. Stephen relative to Tasneem L. Talib United States Tasneem L. Talib's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Tasneem L. Talib · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joanne E. Stephen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne E. Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne E. Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne E. Stephen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne E. Stephen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne E. Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne E. Stephen. The network helps show where Joanne E. Stephen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanne E. Stephen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joanne E. Stephen Line = papers co-authored together Joanne E. Stephen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013235
2 1992196
3 2016118
4 201273
5 200665
6 201460
7 201653
8 201036
9 201331
10 201331
11 202127
12 201525
13 201521
14 201020
15 200218
16
Patient navigation in cancer care: program delivery and research in British Columbia.
200316
17 201916
18 201715
19 201113
20 202012

About Joanne E. Stephen

Joanne E. Stephen is a scholar working on Oncology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (16 papers), Family Support in Illness (7 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Mental Health via Writing (2 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (384 citations), Applied Psychology (67 citations), Clinical Psychology (283 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (141 citations). Joanne E. Stephen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael Speca, Linda Ellen Carlson, Rie Tamagawa, Richard Doll, James E. Marcia, Peter Faris, Lihong Zhong, Karen D. Fergus, Janine Giese‐Davis and Deborah L. McLeod. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Psycho-Oncology, Integrative Cancer Therapies, JNCI Monographs and Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact