Joan Soler‐Vidal

1.1k citations
25 papers · 502 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Joan Soler‐Vidal

25 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Joan Soler‐Vidal
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Clinical Psychology 318
  • Applied Psychology 61
  • Social Psychology 119
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 77
  • Modeling and Simulation 23
Replace Jan Chodkiewicz with:
Jan Chodkiewicz Poland
Clara Paz Ecuador
Sarah Bjedov Croatia
Xiaolin Huang China
Ganesh Kudva Kundadak Singapore
Amine Larnaout Tunisia
Marwa Nofal Egypt
Sevan Minassian France
Frances Adiukwu Nigeria
Ariella Grossman‐Giron Israel
Joan Soler‐Vidal relative to Jan Chodkiewicz Poland Jan Chodkiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jan Chodkiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Soler‐Vidal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Soler‐Vidal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Soler‐Vidal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Soler‐Vidal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Soler‐Vidal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Soler‐Vidal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Soler‐Vidal. The network helps show where Joan Soler‐Vidal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joan Soler‐Vidal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Soler‐Vidal Line = papers co-authored together Joan Soler‐Vidal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020121
2 2020106
3 202044
4 202032
5 202025
6 202022
7 202321
8 202019
9 202018
10 202417
11 201816
12 202110
13 20218
14 20227
15 20217
16 20215
17 20225
18 20243
19 20223
20 20223

About Joan Soler‐Vidal

Joan Soler‐Vidal is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (11 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (318 citations), Applied Psychology (61 citations), Social Psychology (119 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (77 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (23 citations). Joan Soler‐Vidal has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Víctor Pereira-Sánchez, Ramdas Ransing, Mariana Pinto da Costa, Rodrigo Ramalho, Frances Adiukwu, Amine Larnaout, Drita Gashi Bytyçi, Laura Orsolini, Mohammadreza Shalbafan and Marwa Nofal. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Asian Journal of Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, Schizophrenia Research and NeuroImage Clinical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact