Joan Pons-Nin

440 citations
39 papers · 302 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Joan Pons-Nin

38 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Joan Pons-Nin
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 267
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 142
  • Bioengineering 25
  • Biomedical Engineering 127
  • Computer Networks and Communications 27
Replace Tamio Ikehashi with:
Tamio Ikehashi Japan
Jean-Louis Cazaux France
Yoonkee Kim United States
Yang Cui China
Shubin Zhang China
M. Zeier Switzerland
Shiying Xiao China
Tianfu Li China
Karim Allidina Canada
Hyun-Keun Kwon United States
Joan Pons-Nin relative to Tamio Ikehashi Japan Tamio Ikehashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tamio Ikehashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Pons-Nin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Pons-Nin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Pons-Nin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Pons-Nin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Pons-Nin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Pons-Nin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Pons-Nin. The network helps show where Joan Pons-Nin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joan Pons-Nin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Pons-Nin Line = papers co-authored together Joan Pons-Nin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200246
2 201424
3 201221
4 200518
5 200515
6 201513
7 201512
8 200812
9 201011
10 201410
11
Analysis of the Σ-Δ pulsed digital oscillator for MEMS.
20059
12 20129
13 20169
14 20169
15 20188
16 20107
17 20177
18 20176
19 20166
20 20146

About Joan Pons-Nin

Joan Pons-Nin is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (24 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (20 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (8 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (6 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (5 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (4 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (267 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (142 citations), Bioengineering (25 citations), Biomedical Engineering (127 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (27 citations). Joan Pons-Nin has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Ireland and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Manuel Domínguez-Pumar, Elena Blokhina, A. Rodrı́guez, Luís Castañer, Orla Feely, J. Ricart, David López‐Bueno, V. Jiménez, Sandra Bermejo and Gema López. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Sensors, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers and Microelectronics Reliability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact