Joan Cocks
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- Social Work Education and Practice
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
Papers in
-
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 2
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 2
- Australian History and Society 1
- Middle East Politics and Society 1
- Co-authors
- Mona Harrington (1 shared paper)Antonio Y. Vázquez‐Arroyo (1 shared paper)Thomas Biebricher (1 shared paper)Andrew Dilts (1 shared paper)Yves Winter (1 shared paper)Qiuping A. Wang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Perspectives on Politics (2 papers)differences (1 paper)Political Studies (1 paper)Constellations (1 paper)Political Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Joan Cocks
19 papers receiving 572 citations
Joan Cocks's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Public Administration 28
- Gender Studies 72
- Sociology and Political Science 255
- Political Science and International Relations 122
- General Health Professions 115
Countries citing papers authored by Joan Cocks
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Cocks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Cocks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Cocks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Cocks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Cocks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Cocks. The network helps show where Joan Cocks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Joan Cocks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 500 |
| 2 | 1988 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 11 | Cultural theory looks at identity and contradiction | 1990 | 2 |
| 12 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 1 |
About Joan Cocks
Joan Cocks is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (1 paper), Australian History and Society (1 paper), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper), Middle East Politics and Society (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper) and American History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (28 citations), Gender Studies (72 citations), Sociology and Political Science (255 citations), Political Science and International Relations (122 citations) and General Health Professions (115 citations). Joan Cocks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Mona Harrington, Antonio Y. Vázquez‐Arroyo, Thomas Biebricher, Andrew Dilts, Yves Winter and Qiuping A. Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives on Politics, differences, Political Studies, Constellations and Political Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.