Jo Day

416 citations
23 papers · 270 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jo Day

21 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Jo Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 18
  • General Health Professions 95
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 17
  • Neurology 30
  • Public Administration 8
Replace Megan Gately with:
Megan Gately United States
Portia Y. Cornell United States
Nick Zonneveld Netherlands
Gabriele Müller-Mundt Germany
Ivy Benjenk United States
Ann Reddy United States
Louisa Polak United Kingdom
Christine Farrell United States
Jennifer Rayner Canada
Iris Cohen Fineberg United States
Jo Day relative to Megan Gately United States Megan Gately's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Megan Gately · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Day. The network helps show where Jo Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Day Line = papers co-authored together Jo Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015131
2 202143
3 201529
4 201612
5 20189
6 20106
7 20216
8 20235
9 20174
10 20224
11 20233
12 20173
13 20243
14 20242
15 20202
16 20242
17 20162
18 20231
19 20251
20 20201

About Jo Day

Jo Day is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (18 citations), General Health Professions (95 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (17 citations), Neurology (30 citations) and Public Administration (8 citations). Jo Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Nicky Britten, Janet Heaton, Andrew C. Sparkes, Victoria A Goodwin, Abi Hall, Martin Howard, Avril Drummond, Jane Cross, Alison Cowley and Louise Allan. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Health Risk & Society, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology and Physiotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact