Jo Borrill

1.1k citations
36 papers · 819 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jo Borrill

36 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers

Jo Borrill
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Clinical Psychology 361
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 121
  • Oncology 62
  • Sociology and Political Science 144
  • Law 38
Replace Ana González Menéndez with:
Ana González Menéndez Spain
Randolph J. Canterbury United States
Daniel Turner Germany
Ben Greer United Kingdom
Roghieh Nooripour Iran
Leonhard Thun‐Hohenstein Austria
Sheila Williams New Zealand
Mansoor Malik United States
Jie Wu Weiss United States
Marcia J. Chapman United States
Jo Borrill relative to Ana González Menéndez Spain Ana González Menéndez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Ana González Menéndez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Borrill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Borrill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Borrill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Borrill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Borrill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Borrill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Borrill. The network helps show where Jo Borrill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Borrill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Borrill Line = papers co-authored together Jo Borrill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200170
2 201569
3 199766
4 200360
5 200959
6 199858
7 200558
8 200540
9 200629
10 200927
11 201326
12 201825
13 201924
14 199621
15 201921
16 200320
17 201019
18 200218
19 199614
20 201110

About Jo Borrill

Jo Borrill is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science and Law, having authored 36 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (21 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper) and Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (361 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (121 citations), Oncology (62 citations), Sociology and Political Science (144 citations) and Law (38 citations). Jo Borrill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Rachel E. Winder, Derek Roger, Pauline Fox, Maria Flynn, Michael Sharpe, Sue Simkin, Alison Clements, Keith E Hawton, Alex Lloyd and Sara Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as Probation Journal, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Counselling Psychology Quarterly, Social Science & Medicine and International Journal of Forensic Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact