Bob Fields

1k citations
71 papers · 744 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Bob Fields

66 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

Bob Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Human-Computer Interaction 235
  • Applied Psychology 72
  • Library and Information Sciences 22
  • Software 24
  • Social Psychology 91
Replace Eva Hudlická with:
Eva Hudlická United States
Jichen Zhu United States
Erik Frøkjær Denmark
Kael Rowan United States
Scott D. Wood United States
Carolin Wienrich Germany
Neema Moraveji United States
Deborah A. Boehm‐Davis United States
Sarah M. North United States
Greg Walsh United States
Bob Fields relative to Eva Hudlická United States Eva Hudlická's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Eva Hudlická · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bob Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bob Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Fields. The network helps show where Bob Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bob Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bob Fields Line = papers co-authored together Bob Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015155
2 201538
3 200036
4 200527
5 200726
6 199625
7 201625
8 201825
9 200123
10 201722
11 201921
12 200617
13 200215
14 199714
15 202114
16 200813
17 201013
18 200912
19 200910
20 201110

About Bob Fields

Bob Fields is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 71 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (27 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (13 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (10 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (9 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers) and Air Traffic Management and Optimization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (235 citations), Applied Psychology (72 citations), Library and Information Sciences (22 citations), Software (24 citations) and Social Psychology (91 citations). Bob Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Peter R. Wright, Lisa Marzano, Andy Bardill, Paul Moran, Nick Grey, David M. Veale, ANN E. BLANDFORD, Andy Dearden, Michael D. Harrison and Simon Attfield. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition Technology & Work, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Archives of Suicide Research, Journal of Affective Disorders and Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact