J-M Chartier

809 citations
51 papers · 689 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

J-M Chartier

50 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

J-M Chartier
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 202
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 460
  • Oceanography 114
  • Spectroscopy 27
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 59
Replace L. F. Vitushkin with:
L. F. Vitushkin Russia
Patrick Pinot France
Petr Křen Czechia
Renée Charrière France
Qin Luo China
Matthew Himsworth United Kingdom
Zhaoying Wang China
Elena Marx United States
Taylor Lilly United States
J. P. Marque France
J-M Chartier relative to L. F. Vitushkin Russia L. F. Vitushkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
L. F. Vitushkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J-M Chartier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J-M Chartier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J-M Chartier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J-M Chartier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J-M Chartier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J-M Chartier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J-M Chartier. The network helps show where J-M Chartier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J-M Chartier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J-M Chartier Line = papers co-authored together J-M Chartier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200257
2 199239
3 200135
4 198930
5 199130
6 199530
7 200130
8 199328
9 200328
10 198924
11 199224
12 199824
13 200322
14 199320
15 199720
16 199718
17 199818
18 199918
19 199716
20 197515

About J-M Chartier

J-M Chartier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Oceanography, Spectroscopy and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 51 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (45 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (20 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (5 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (1 paper), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (1 paper) and Laser Design and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (202 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (460 citations), Oceanography (114 citations), Spectroscopy (27 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (59 citations). J-M Chartier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include L. Robertsson, Esa A. Jaatinen, Shigeo Iwasaki, Taylor Quinn, J. L. Hall, Jun Ye, Tai Hyun Yoon, Robert S. Windeler, G. S. Sasagawa and W. R. C. Rowley. Their work appears in journals such as Metrologia, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Applied Physics B, Optics Communications and Measurement Techniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact