Taylor Lilly

406 citations
36 papers · 332 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Taylor Lilly

35 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Taylor Lilly
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Applied Mathematics 104
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 5
  • Spectroscopy 87
  • Aerospace Engineering 87
  • Computational Mechanics 66
Replace Sarah A. Tedder with:
Sarah A. Tedder United States
M. Webster United Kingdom
Frank Siebe Germany
Kyle M. Hanquist United States
Arnold J. Kelly United States
Bijiao He China
O. Kunova Russia
Revathi Jambunathan United States
Michael C. Fowler United States
Trevor Moeller United States
Taylor Lilly relative to Sarah A. Tedder United States Sarah A. Tedder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Sarah A. Tedder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Taylor Lilly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Taylor Lilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taylor Lilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taylor Lilly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Taylor Lilly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Taylor Lilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Taylor Lilly. The network helps show where Taylor Lilly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Taylor Lilly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Taylor Lilly Line = papers co-authored together Taylor Lilly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200547
2 200740
3 200631
4 201424
5 201218
6 200916
7 201416
8 200615
9 201414
10 201214
11 201511
12 200811
13 200510
14 20119
15 20137
16 20076
17 20135
18 20074
19 20134
20 20084

About Taylor Lilly

Taylor Lilly is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Applied Mathematics, Aerospace Engineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (11 papers), Laser Design and Applications (9 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (9 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (7 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (6 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (104 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (5 citations), Spectroscopy (87 citations), Aerospace Engineering (87 citations) and Computational Mechanics (66 citations). Taylor Lilly has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Ketsdever, Sergey Gimelshein, Natalia Gimelshein, Eugene Moskovets, G. Markelov, Anthony Pancotti, R. J. Knize, Ingrid J. Wysong, Mikhail N. Shneider and Matthew Young. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Optics Express, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets and Physics of Fluids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact