JL Steimer

8 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

JL Steimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 213
  • Statistics and Probability 189
  • Pharmacology 43
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 69
  • Modeling and Simulation 17
Replace Efthymios Manolis with:
Efthymios Manolis Netherlands
Kenneth G. Kowalski United States
Teun M. Post United States
Lutz O. Harnisch United States
Matthew M. Riggs United States
Kristin E. Karlsson Sweden
Mirjam Nadine Trame United States
Joakim Nyberg Sweden
Mats O. Karlsson Sweden
PLS Chan United Kingdom
JL Steimer relative to Efthymios Manolis Netherlands Efthymios Manolis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Efthymios Manolis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by JL Steimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JL Steimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JL Steimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JL Steimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JL Steimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JL Steimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JL Steimer. The network helps show where JL Steimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside JL Steimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with JL Steimer Line = papers co-authored together JL Steimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2015296
2 200065
3
Exploring clinical study design by computer simulation based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling.
199738
4 201319
5 200613
6 19869
7 20138
8 19904
9
Bioéquivalence des formes pharmaceutiques. Approche par intervalles de confiance, méthode de Westlake.
19800

About JL Steimer

JL Steimer is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmaceutical Science, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (1 paper), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (1 paper), Bone health and treatments (1 paper) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (213 citations), Statistics and Probability (189 citations), Pharmacology (43 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (69 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (17 citations). JL Steimer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Gieschke, Sandra A. G. Visser, Rolf Burghaus, Alexander Staab, Jörg Lippert, Oscar Della Pasqua, Thomas Kerbusch, Peter A. Milligan, Bengt Hamrén and Valérie F. Cosson. Their work appears in journals such as CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, Therapies and International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact