J.L. Binder

13 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

J.L. Binder
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • General Psychology 9
  • Ocean Engineering 101
  • Computational Mechanics 133
  • Clinical Psychology 88
  • Applied Psychology 14
Replace Sreedevi Krishnan with:
Sreedevi Krishnan United States
William T. Snyder United States
Alexander Busch Norway
John Kent United Kingdom
W. Murgatroyd United Kingdom
Robert James Mackinnon United States
Jacob Smith United States
J. Edwards United Kingdom
Shuzeng Zhang China
Zhipeng Liu China
J.L. Binder relative to Sreedevi Krishnan United States Sreedevi Krishnan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Sreedevi Krishnan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.L. Binder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.L. Binder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.L. Binder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.L. Binder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.L. Binder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.L. Binder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.L. Binder. The network helps show where J.L. Binder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside J.L. Binder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.L. Binder Line = papers co-authored together J.L. Binder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199095
2 199959
3 200059
4 199149
5 198925
6 199223
7
Status and future direction of the melt attack and coolability experiments (MACE) program at Argonne National Laboratory.
200111
8 19963
9
CETE R&D at Oak Ridge National Laboratory Supporting Management of Nuclear Waste - 9227
20093
10 20102
11 19932
12 19872
13
Nuclear Desalination Options for the International Reactor Innovative and Secure (IRIS) Design
20042

About J.L. Binder

J.L. Binder is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry, Clinical Psychology, Ocean Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (3 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (3 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (3 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (2 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (2 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (2 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (9 citations), Ocean Engineering (101 citations), Computational Mechanics (133 citations), Clinical Psychology (88 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). J.L. Binder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Hanratty, Stephen F. Butler, William Henry, Hans H. Strupp, Edward Bein, Timothy Anderson, B. A. Huber, H. R. Koslowski, K. Wiesemann and H. Lebius. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Clinical Psychology Review, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Psychotherapy Research and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact