J.K. Choe

2.2k citations
105 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

J.K. Choe

98 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

J.K. Choe
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Catalysis 276
  • Reproductive Medicine 248
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 396
  • Water Science and Technology 289
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 147
Replace Wanlu Li with:
Wanlu Li United States
Xiaoling Ma China
Xinyi Zhang China
Hai Chen China
Yanxin Yu China
Xiaoyu Meng China
Faheem Shah Pakistan
Katherine M. Buettner United States
Zhang Lin China
Wenjuan Shen China
J.K. Choe relative to Wanlu Li United States Wanlu Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wanlu Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.K. Choe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.K. Choe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.K. Choe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.K. Choe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.K. Choe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.K. Choe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.K. Choe. The network helps show where J.K. Choe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.K. Choe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.K. Choe Line = papers co-authored together J.K. Choe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019101
2 201298
3 201695
4 201491
5 201576
6 201374
7 201371
8 201264
9 202162
10 201760
11 201858
12 202052
13 201048
14 201448
15 201843
16 201540
17
Neither sildenafil nor vaginal estradiol improves endometrial thickness in women with thin endometria after taking oral estradiol in graduating dosages.
200439
18 202031
19 202128
20 201925

About J.K. Choe

J.K. Choe is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (42 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (38 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (25 papers), Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research (11 papers), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (11 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers), Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact (10 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (276 citations), Reproductive Medicine (248 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (396 citations), Water Science and Technology (289 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (147 citations). J.K. Choe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Yongju Choi, Charles J. Werth, Timothy J. Strathmann, John R. Shapley, Seenu Ravi, Danmeng Shuai, Jinyong Liu, Jeremy S. Guest, J.H. Check and Jerome H. Check. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Environmental Science & Technology, Water Research, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Chemosphere.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact