Jiu Ping Ding

1.2k citations
13 papers · 1.0k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jiu Ping Ding

13 papers receiving 978 citations

Peers

Jiu Ping Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 448
  • Sensory Systems 105
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 341
  • Molecular Biology 779
  • Plant Science 292
Replace Heun Soh with:
Heun Soh United States
Wanjun Yang United States
A. Marie Phillips Australia
Thierry Cens France
Barry Ganetzky United States
Ramón Latorre Chile
Brett Simms Canada
LK Kaczmarek United States
Wiebke Hirdes Germany
Claudia F. Beck United States
Jiu Ping Ding relative to Heun Soh United States Heun Soh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Heun Soh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jiu Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jiu Ping Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jiu Ping Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jiu Ping Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jiu Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jiu Ping Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jiu Ping Ding. The network helps show where Jiu Ping Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jiu Ping Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jiu Ping Ding Line = papers co-authored together Jiu Ping Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1999229
2 1993201
3 2002110
4 199381
5 199870
6 199667
7 199158
8 199355
9 200139
10 199932
11 200130
12 200225
13 20056

About Jiu Ping Ding

Jiu Ping Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Sensory Systems, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (10 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper) and Plant Reproductive Biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (448 citations), Sensory Systems (105 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (341 citations), Molecular Biology (779 citations) and Plant Science (292 citations). Jiu Ping Ding has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Lingle, Barbara G. Pickard, Xiaoming Xia, Yingwei Wang, Frederick Sachs, Richard Salvi, Xuhui Zeng, Christopher R. Solaro, Murali Prakriya and Vani Kalyanaraman. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Journal, The Journal of General Physiology, Journal of Neuroscience, Biophysical Journal and European Biophysics Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact