Jin‐Duck Bok
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
-
- Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Papers in
-
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 2
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 2
- Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides 2
-
- Enzyme Production and Characterization 4
- Co-authors
- Douglas E. Eveleigh (2 shared papers)Dinesh Yernool (2 shared papers)Yun‐Jaie Choi (9 shared papers)Chong‐Su Cho (12 shared papers)Sang‐Kee Kang (12 shared papers)James K. McCarthy (1 shared paper)Yun-Jaie Choi (6 shared papers)Bijay Singh (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (1 paper)Current Microbiology (1 paper)Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (1 paper)Microbial Cell Factories (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Jin‐Duck Bok
20 papers receiving 478 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Biotechnology 159
- Nutrition and Dietetics 72
- Pharmaceutical Science 29
- Animal Science and Zoology 41
- Molecular Biology 239
Countries citing papers authored by Jin‐Duck Bok
This map shows the geographic impact of Jin‐Duck Bok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jin‐Duck Bok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jin‐Duck Bok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jin‐Duck Bok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jin‐Duck Bok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jin‐Duck Bok. The network helps show where Jin‐Duck Bok may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jin‐Duck Bok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 104 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 6 |
About Jin‐Duck Bok
Jin‐Duck Bok is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Plant Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytase and its Applications (4 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (4 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (3 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (3 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (2 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (159 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (72 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (29 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (41 citations) and Molecular Biology (239 citations). Jin‐Duck Bok has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Douglas E. Eveleigh, Dinesh Yernool, Yun‐Jaie Choi, Chong‐Su Cho, Sang‐Kee Kang, James K. McCarthy, Yun-Jaie Choi, Bijay Singh, Sushila Maharjan and Seungha Kang. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Current Microbiology, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Microbial Cell Factories and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.