J.I.M. Egger

182 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

J.I.M. Egger
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Applied Psychology 161
  • Clinical Psychology 509
  • Genetics 537
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 303
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 42
Replace Daniel E. Gustavson with:
Daniel E. Gustavson United States
Tara Murphy United Kingdom
Lisa S. Freund United States
Sabrina Michelle Darrow United States
Alessandro Rotondo United States
Jennifer Jordan New Zealand
Peter Annas Sweden
Judith R. O’Jile United States
Joseph Gonzalez–Heydrich United States
Robert C. Cloninger United States
J.I.M. Egger relative to Daniel E. Gustavson United States Daniel E. Gustavson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Daniel E. Gustavson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.I.M. Egger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.I.M. Egger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.I.M. Egger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.I.M. Egger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.I.M. Egger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.I.M. Egger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.I.M. Egger. The network helps show where J.I.M. Egger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.I.M. Egger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.I.M. Egger Line = papers co-authored together J.I.M. Egger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 197 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202098
2 201076
3 201168
4 201463
5 201253
6 201553
7 201145
8 200743
9 201340
10 201639
11 201337
12 201936
13 201735
14 200333
15 200733
16 201132
17 201132
18 201732
19 201331
20 201229

About J.I.M. Egger

J.I.M. Egger is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 197 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (27 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (26 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (22 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (19 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (18 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (16 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (15 papers) and Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (161 citations), Clinical Psychology (509 citations), Genetics (537 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (303 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (42 citations). J.I.M. Egger has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Willem M. A. Verhoeven, Roy P. C. Kessels, Ellen Wingbermühle, Paul T. van der Heijden, Jan J. L. Derksen, Tjitske Kleefstra, Hubert R. A. De Mey, Serge J. W. Walvoort, Nicole de Leeuw and Constance Vissers. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Genes Brain & Behavior, Journal of Personality Assessment, Assessment and Psychopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact