Jim Chalmers

1.8k citations
34 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Jim Chalmers

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Jim Chalmers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 302
  • Internal Medicine 24
  • Health 50
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 43
  • Urology 35
Replace Mark Turrentine with:
Mark Turrentine United States
B. Burt Gerstman United States
Matthew R. Cohn United States
Patrick Moran Ireland
Jonathan Cottenet France
Mette Vinther Skriver Denmark
Bev Shea Canada
Antoine Rachas France
Jason Gurney New Zealand
Wai Yoong United Kingdom
Jim Chalmers relative to Mark Turrentine United States Mark Turrentine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Mark Turrentine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Chalmers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Chalmers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Chalmers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Chalmers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Chalmers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Chalmers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Chalmers. The network helps show where Jim Chalmers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jim Chalmers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Chalmers Line = papers co-authored together Jim Chalmers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007155
2 2006112
3 200190
4 200472
5 200768
6 201166
7 201066
8 200962
9 200957
10 201053
11 200852
12 200849
13 199547
14 200443
15 201036
16 199735
17 200234
18 200233
19 200730
20 201026

About Jim Chalmers

Jim Chalmers is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Surgery and Infectious Diseases, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (2 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (302 citations), Internal Medicine (24 citations), Health (50 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (43 citations) and Urology (35 citations). Jim Chalmers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kate Macintyre, John J.V. McMurray, Adam Redpath, Simon Stewart, Pardeep S. Jhund, Simon Capewell, Niamh Murphy, Colin R Simpson, Alan Finlayson and Harry Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health, Archives of Disease in Childhood, BMC Neurology, Circulation Heart Failure and BMC Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact