Jill Meyer

19 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Jill Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Social Psychology 418
  • Gender Studies 136
  • Reproductive Medicine 97
  • Clinical Psychology 176
  • Sociology and Political Science 232
Replace Elissa L. Sarno with:
Elissa L. Sarno United States
B. J. Rye Canada
Eric K. Layland United States
Robin A. Buhrke United States
Dani Wright Toussaint Australia
Karla Anhalt United States
Whitney W. Black United States
Sune Innala Sweden
Meredith R. Maroney United States
Brian D. Zamboni United States
Jill Meyer relative to Elissa L. Sarno United States Elissa L. Sarno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Elissa L. Sarno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jill Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Meyer. The network helps show where Jill Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jill Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jill Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Jill Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008242
2 2008154
3 200751
4 197826
5 200821
6 201820
7 201416
8 20139
9 20157
10 20206
11 20225
12 20154
13 20143
14 20132
15 20192
16 20221
17 20221
18 20201
19
Career Thoughts of Male Offenders Re-Entering Society Using Cognitive Theory Assessment.
20171
20
An Analysis of Career Thinking and Career Interests of Incarcerated Males
20131

About Jill Meyer

Jill Meyer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 24 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Career Development and Diversity (4 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (3 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (418 citations), Gender Studies (136 citations), Reproductive Medicine (97 citations), Clinical Psychology (176 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (232 citations). Jill Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Susan Kashubeck‐West, Dawn M. Szymanski, Margaret M. Flores, Martin Holmén, D. Richard Laws, Vanessa Hinton, Margaret E. Shippen, Stephanie Morano, Marilyn A. Cornish and David E. Houchins. Their work appears in journals such as The Counseling Psychologist, Rehabilitation Psychology, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Remedial and Special Education and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact