Ji-Gen Chen

2.7k citations
86 papers · 2.2k · 1 hit paper · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Ji-Gen Chen

78 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Ji-Gen Chen's Hit Papers

Machine learning in materials science 2019 · 848 citations
8480+2+4Years since publication250500750

Peers

Ji-Gen Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 557
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 93
  • Artificial Intelligence 121
  • Mechanical Engineering 75
Replace Xing Liu with:
Xing Liu China
G. J. Conduit United Kingdom
Yi‐Tao Wang China
Giorgos Fagas Ireland
Mário R. G. Marques Germany
Yunqi Liu China
Haixia Chen China
Meng Yang China
Keith D. Humfeld United States
Martin Votsmeier Germany
Ji-Gen Chen relative to Xing Liu China Xing Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Xing Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ji-Gen Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ji-Gen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ji-Gen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ji-Gen Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ji-Gen Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ji-Gen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ji-Gen Chen. The network helps show where Ji-Gen Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ji-Gen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ji-Gen Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ji-Gen Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Machine learning in materials science
Hit paper breakdown →
2019848
2 2018183
3 2017109
4 202073
5 201963
6 201151
7 202046
8 201544
9 202044
10 202041
11 201038
12 201936
13 202036
14 201233
15 202331
16 201530
17 201527
18 201125
19 201225
20 200724

About Ji-Gen Chen

Ji-Gen Chen is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Spectroscopy, Artificial Intelligence and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (73 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (3 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (1 paper), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (1 paper) and Machine Learning in Materials Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (557 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (93 citations), Artificial Intelligence (121 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (75 citations). Ji-Gen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Yujun Yang, Hui‐Xiong Deng, Jing Wei, Kun Xu, Zhongming Wei, Xiangyu Sun, Shicheng Jiang, C. D. Lin, Ruifeng Lu and Chao Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Chinese Physics Letters, Optics Express, Symmetry and Physical review. B..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact