Jia‐In Lee

29 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Jia‐In Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Clinical Psychology 109
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 6
  • Social Psychology 57
  • Nephrology 17
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 19
Replace Zarintaj Malihi with:
Zarintaj Malihi New Zealand
John J. McGarry United States
Alicia Padrón‐Monedero Spain
Stephanie Anderson United States
Anne Jurkutat Germany
Yonghai Dong China
Tuija Jääskeläinen Finland
Lihong Zhong Canada
Eladio Collado‐Boira Spain
Xue‐Lei Fu China
Jia‐In Lee relative to Zarintaj Malihi New Zealand Zarintaj Malihi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Zarintaj Malihi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jia‐In Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jia‐In Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jia‐In Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jia‐In Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jia‐In Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jia‐In Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jia‐In Lee. The network helps show where Jia‐In Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jia‐In Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jia‐In Lee Line = papers co-authored together Jia‐In Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010115
2 202145
3 201535
4 202123
5 202321
6 202219
7 202217
8 202114
9 202412
10 202212
11 201412
12 202312
13 202311
14 202210
15 202410
16 20229
17 20229
18 20239
19 20228
20 20198

About Jia‐In Lee

Jia‐In Lee is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Social Psychology, Molecular Biology and Nephrology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (2 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (109 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (6 citations), Social Psychology (57 citations), Nephrology (17 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (19 citations). Jia‐In Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jiun‐Hung Geng, Szu‐Chia Chen, Ming‐Been Lee, Chia‐Ming Chang, Shih‐Cheng Liao, Shu‐Pin Huang, Cheng‐Fang Yen, Yung‐Chin Lee, Jung‐Tsung Shen and Hung‐Lung Ke. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Frontiers in Public Health, International Journal of Medical Sciences, Scientific Reports and Journal of Personalized Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact