J.G. Walker

65 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

J.G. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Speech and Hearing 200
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 40
  • Biophysics 106
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 321
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 338
Replace H.L. Bertoni with:
H.L. Bertoni United States
Prabhakar H. Pathak United States
A. van den Bos Netherlands
Craig K. Rushforth United States
Timothy J. Schulz United States
Robert G. Kouyoumjian United States
René Dändliker Switzerland
Edward H. Linfoot United Kingdom
Javier Garcia-Monreal Spain
Takuso Sato Japan
J.G. Walker relative to H.L. Bertoni United States H.L. Bertoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.3×
H.L. Bertoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.G. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.G. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.G. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.G. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.G. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.G. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.G. Walker. The network helps show where J.G. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.G. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.G. Walker Line = papers co-authored together J.G. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995397
2 1983112
3 198288
4 200582
5 198263
6 198562
7 198860
8 198458
9 198153
10 200237
11 197927
12 200227
13 197826
14 199925
15 199123
16 199218
17 199618
18 198915
19 199015
20 199315

About J.G. Walker

J.G. Walker is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (16 papers), Noise Effects and Management (14 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (10 papers), Random lasers and scattering media (9 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (8 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (7 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (5 papers) and Near-Field Optical Microscopy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (200 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (40 citations), Biophysics (106 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (321 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (338 citations). J.G. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward R. Pike, David A. Fish, James M. Fields, Eric Jakeman, Peter C. Y. Chang, Keith Iain Hopcraft, Richard G. White, H. Saunders, M. Bertero and R. J. Scaddan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sound and Vibration, Optics Communications, Measurement Science and Technology, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact