J.G. Bomer

651 citations
23 papers · 491 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

J.G. Bomer

23 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

J.G. Bomer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Bioengineering 153
  • Electrochemistry 57
  • Reproductive Medicine 66
  • Biomedical Engineering 291
  • Molecular Medicine 16
Replace Wooseok Jung with:
Wooseok Jung United States
Siyi Lai United States
Muhammad S. Khan United States
Xinwu Xie China
Shuang Wu China
Ron L. Bardell United States
Debdyuti Mandal United States
S.A. Awan United Kingdom
Chathurika D. Abeyrathne Australia
Aniruddha Puntambekar United States
J.G. Bomer relative to Wooseok Jung United States Wooseok Jung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Wooseok Jung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.G. Bomer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.G. Bomer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.G. Bomer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.G. Bomer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.G. Bomer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.G. Bomer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.G. Bomer. The network helps show where J.G. Bomer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.G. Bomer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.G. Bomer Line = papers co-authored together J.G. Bomer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201664
2 200554
3 200551
4 201547
5 200546
6 200745
7 199731
8 201427
9 199321
10 199820
11 199116
12 198915
13 199014
14 19929
15 20229
16 20138
17 20195
18 20023
19 20192
20
Physicochemical phenomena in nanochannels
20031

About J.G. Bomer

J.G. Bomer is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electrochemistry and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 23 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (12 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (5 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (3 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (3 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (2 papers) and Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (153 citations), Electrochemistry (57 citations), Reproductive Medicine (66 citations), Biomedical Engineering (291 citations) and Molecular Medicine (16 citations). J.G. Bomer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Wouter Olthuis, Albert van den Berg, P. Bergveld, Bjorn de Wagenaar, Loes I. Segerink, S. Herber, Jan C. T. Eijkel, Stefan C. Dekker, D.C. Hermes and Walter M. van Gulik. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Lab on a Chip, Sensors and Actuators A Physical, Biomedical Microdevices and Microelectronic Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact