Jérôme Dinet

1.3k citations
70 papers · 807 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jérôme Dinet

59 papers receiving 752 citations

Peers

Jérôme Dinet
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 136
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
  • Human-Computer Interaction 49
  • Rehabilitation 49
  • Library and Information Sciences 12
Replace Tina Weston with:
Tina Weston Canada
Antonella Pavese United States
Kenneth Reeder Canada
Geoffrey B. Duggan United Kingdom
Karen Murphy Australia
Jim Lumsden United Kingdom
David S. Kreiner United States
Jiří Lukavský Czechia
Sofia B. Dias Portugal
Toni Rietveld Netherlands
Jérôme Dinet relative to Tina Weston Canada Tina Weston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Tina Weston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jérôme Dinet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jérôme Dinet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jérôme Dinet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jérôme Dinet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jérôme Dinet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jérôme Dinet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jérôme Dinet. The network helps show where Jérôme Dinet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jérôme Dinet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jérôme Dinet Line = papers co-authored together Jérôme Dinet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006118
2 201094
3 201478
4 201644
5 200444
6 201243
7 202238
8 202134
9 201824
10 202123
11 202121
12 201420
13 201619
14 201616
15 200315
16 201113
17 200013
18 201813
19 201012
20 201910

About Jérôme Dinet

Jérôme Dinet is a scholar working on Education, Human-Computer Interaction, Neurology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (8 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers), AI in Service Interactions (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (4 papers), Education and Technology Integration (4 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (4 papers) and Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (136 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (49 citations), Rehabilitation (49 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (12 citations). Jérôme Dinet has collaborated with scholars based in France, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Munéo Kitajima, Jean‐François Rouet, Rui Nouchi, H. Kurth, Ṣẹ̀yẹ Abògúnr̀in, Damien Léger, Nathalie Pelletier‐Fleury, Marc Le Vaillant, Christine Ros and Mônica Macedo‐Rouet. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Computers in the Schools, Current Medical Research and Opinion and Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact