Jerome C. Foo

6.0k citations
49 papers · 606 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jerome C. Foo

45 papers receiving 596 citations

Peers

Jerome C. Foo
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Biological Psychiatry 48
  • Clinical Psychology 152
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 34
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 18
  • Speech and Hearing 32
Replace Dahlia Mukherjee with:
Dahlia Mukherjee United States
Alexandra Macgregor France
Katherine S. F. Damme United States
Fernando Silva Neves Brazil
Sarah H. Sperry United States
Ömer Akil Özer Türkiye
Rebecca A. Chandler United States
Charles Cotrena Brazil
Laura Damiani Branco Brazil
Hagop Akiskal United States
Jerome C. Foo relative to Dahlia Mukherjee United States Dahlia Mukherjee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Dahlia Mukherjee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jerome C. Foo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jerome C. Foo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jerome C. Foo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jerome C. Foo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jerome C. Foo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jerome C. Foo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jerome C. Foo. The network helps show where Jerome C. Foo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jerome C. Foo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jerome C. Foo Line = papers co-authored together Jerome C. Foo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019100
2 201739
3 201831
4 201928
5 202027
6 202124
7 202122
8 201821
9 201820
10 201620
11 202118
12 202118
13 201818
14 202316
15 202216
16 201814
17 202213
18 201712
19 202212
20 201912

About Jerome C. Foo

Jerome C. Foo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 49 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (48 citations), Clinical Psychology (152 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (34 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations) and Speech and Hearing (32 citations). Jerome C. Foo has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fumiharu Togo, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Tsukasa Sasaki, Fabian Streit, Stephanie H. Witt, Josef Frank, Marcella Rietschel, Rainer Spanagel, Lea Sirignano and Shuntaro Ando. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry, JMIR Mental Health, Scientific Reports and American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact